Calculadora de Proporción Áurea

I know the…

Solves shorter = a / φ, total = a + a/φ.

Longer (a)
100
Shorter (b)
61.8034
Total (a + b)
161.8034
a / b = 1.618034 = φ  ·  (a + b) / a = 1.618034 = φ
Golden rectangle preview

Dashed line marks the b × b square. Remove it and what remains is another golden rectangle — that recursion is what gives the spiral its shape.

La Calculadora de Proporción Áurea encuentra las partes que faltan de un rectángulo áureo. Dale el lado largo (a), el corto (b) o el total (a + b) y te devuelve los otros dos de modo que a / b = (a + b) / a = φ. φ vale 1.618033988749895, el único número positivo en el que la relación entre el todo y la parte mayor es igual a la relación entre la parte mayor y la menor. Los diseñadores la usan para trazar retículas, elegir tamaños de tipografía y espaciar una imagen principal; los fotógrafos, para recortar. No es misticismo: es una forma rápida y repetible de fijar proporciones que se ven equilibradas.

Built by Bob Article by Lace QA by Ben Shipped

Cómo usar

  1. 1

    Elige qué conoces: el lado largo, el corto o el total. La mayoría de las decisiones de maquetación empiezan con un total conocido (ancho de página, ventana).

  2. 2

    Escribe el valor. La calculadora se actualiza mientras escribes; no hay botón de calcular.

  3. 3

    Lee los dos valores derivados. La tarjeta resaltada es la que introdujiste; las otras son calculadas.

  4. 4

    Usa el rectángulo de vista previa como comprobación: la línea discontinua marca el cuadrado b × b que, al quitarlo, deja otro rectángulo áureo (la recursión que traza la espiral).

  5. 5

    Copia los números largo y corto en tu herramienta de diseño. Para escalas tipográficas, multiplica tu tamaño base por φ para obtener el siguiente nivel (16 → 25.9 → 41.9); para retículas, pon la columna principal en a y la barra lateral en b.

Preguntas frecuentes

Ratings & Reviews

Rate this tool

Sign in to leave a written review.
Loading reviews…

What This Calculator Does

The Microapp Golden Ratio Calculator takes one length — the longer side (a), the shorter side (b), or the total (a + b) — and returns the other two so that the proportions sit at φ. φ is 1.618033988749895, the unique positive number that satisfies a / b = (a + b) / a. Designers, photographers, typographers, and architects have been using this proportion for centuries because it produces layouts that read as balanced without being symmetrical.

The three identities:
• If you know a: b = a / φ, total = a + b = a × (1 + 1/φ) = a × φ
• If you know b: a = b × φ, total = b × (1 + φ)
• If you know the total: a = total / φ, b = total − a = total × (1 − 1/φ)

All three are derived from a single equation: x² = x + 1. φ is the positive root.

Where the Golden Ratio Actually Helps

Three concrete uses earn the proportion its place in a designer's toolkit. Outside these, treating φ as magic is mostly folklore.

Layout grids

A page with a main column and a sidebar reads more comfortably when their widths are at φ rather than 2:1 or 3:1. On a 1200-pixel wrap, that's roughly a 742-pixel main and a 458-pixel side. The 2:1 split (800/400) feels mechanical; the 3:1 split (900/300) crowds the sidebar; the φ split reads natural. The same logic applies vertically — hero image height to body height, header to article.

Typography scales

A modular type scale picks one number — the ratio between adjacent type sizes — and multiplies by it at each step. With φ as the ratio, starting from a 16px base:

StepMultiplierSize (px)Typical use
−11 / φ9.9captions, footnotes
0 (base)116body text
+1φ25.9h4, lede paragraph
+2φ²41.9h3, section title
+3φ³67.8h2, article title
+4φ⁴109.6h1, page hero

φ is on the dramatic end of common type-scale ratios — the 1:1.618 jump between adjacent steps is large. For dense UI (dashboards, admin panels), a tighter 1.125, 1.2, 1.25, or 1.333 ratio reads better. For editorial layouts (long-form articles, magazines, brochures, hero pages), φ lands.

Photography and composition

The "golden ratio crop" is the photographer's version of the rule of thirds, with the dividing lines at 1/φ ≈ 0.382 and 1 − 1/φ ≈ 0.618 of the frame instead of at 1/3 and 2/3. Place the subject — eyes, horizon, the main element — on one of the inner intersections. The shift from thirds to φ is small (≈5%) but consistent: thirds give a slightly punchier composition, φ gives a slightly calmer one. Crop tools in Lightroom, Capture One, and Affinity Photo all offer both overlays.

The Golden Spiral, Briefly

The famous spiral isn't a property of φ itself — it's what you get when you draw a quarter-circle in each square of a recursively subdivided golden rectangle. Take a golden rectangle. Remove the largest square that fits inside (its side equals the shorter side b). What remains is a smaller golden rectangle, rotated 90°. Repeat. The dashed line in the preview marks the first such subdivision. Draw arcs in each square and the curves connect into the logarithmic spiral that approximates the one in a nautilus shell.

Most "golden spiral in nature" images are loose approximations — real spirals in shells, galaxies, and hurricanes aren't exactly logarithmic and rarely match the golden growth factor. What's accurate: seed-spiral angles in sunflowers, pinecones, and pineapples cluster around 137.5°, which is 360° × (1 − 1/φ). That angle, called the golden angle, packs new growth around the center without two units ever lining up — because φ is the "most irrational" number, never well-approximated by a simple fraction.

What φ Isn't

The Parthenon, the Pyramids, the Mona Lisa, the human face, the Apple logo — most of the "golden ratio appears here!" claims you'll find on Pinterest or in design-101 articles are after-the-fact pattern matching. Measurements don't actually pin to 1.618 in those examples; you can fit any 1.5–1.7 ratio post-hoc and call it golden. The myth grew in the 19th century when mathematician Adolf Zeising started spotting φ everywhere, and it has been over-claimed since.

Two genuine cases survive: plant growth (the golden-angle packing, above) and deliberate use by designers and architects who actually applied it (Le Corbusier's Modulor, some Renaissance-era manuscripts, modern grid systems). The Parthenon and Mona Lisa aren't on that list — the cherry-pick on those was done by 20th-century writers, not by Phidias or Leonardo.

The practical takeaway: treat φ as a useful default proportion, not a universal law. When in doubt about how to split a layout, φ gives a reproducible, balanced answer. It's not magic — it's just a number that doesn't divide cleanly, so it never produces a "boring" symmetrical result.

φ vs. the Other Metallic Ratios

Golden isn't the only proportion in the family. The "metallic ratios" are the positive solutions of x² = nx + 1 for n = 1, 2, 3, …:

NamenValueWhere you'll see it
Golden11.618layouts, type scales, photo crops
Silver22.414octagon geometry, some web headers
Bronze33.303extreme banner aspect ratios

For most practical design work, golden is the only metallic ratio that gets used by name. The √2 ratio (1.414) of ISO 216 paper (A4, A3, A5) is sometimes called the "silver ratio" but it's a different number; the property that matters there is that halving a sheet along its long edge produces a sheet of the same aspect ratio.

Quick Reference — Common Golden Rectangles

Longer side (a)Shorter side (b)Total (a + b)
10061.80161.80
200123.61323.61
500309.02809.02
1000618.031618.03
1200 (page wrap)741.641941.64
1920 (HD video frame)1186.713106.71

Related Tools

For other proportions used in screen design, see the Aspect Ratio Calculator — it handles 16:9, 4:3, 21:9, and any custom width-to-height ratio. For converting design tokens from pixel to rem when building a golden type scale, the Pixel to Rem Converter emits a ready-to-paste CSS variables block. For picking colors that sit at proportional spacings around the wheel, the Color Palette Generator works on similar harmonic principles.